In a story I’m writing there is a character named Catalyst.
Catalyst is an ambassador. Ambassadors negotiate peace and foment discord, as
required by the political body they serve; specifically, the agenda of the
power brokers who influence that political body.
Catalyst is a cynical character.
Are our news sources cynical as well? I don’t know. I do know that I became a cynical news consumer, and an
aggravated commenter. Read the comments beneath any news piece on the internet
and feel the itch to log in and rejoin. En garde! Claim your space, bash the
other side. Anonymously. Because who wants to be attacked for an opinion?
To be clear, news is not opinion. Journalism is not opinion.
What we read today is primarily not news. What we find is an
endless loop of links to opinion pieces that conform to our gut
take on a news story, and we choose what we consume based on confirmation bias.
Guests on TV nonfiction (can't call these news) shows are well-known for which side they’re on. News has
become a virus-its sole mission to replicate itself.
Why do I see weekly Rush Limbaugh video on MSNBC shows
except Rachel Maddow’s and Chris Hayes’? Because MSNBC is confirming our
political bias, while whining that Fox News does the same thing. Why does Dee Dee Myers wish the Anthony Weiner story would
go away, while agreeing to discuss the Anthony Weiner story on a Sunday nonfiction
show?
Famine, one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, is a
character in Terry Pratchett/Neil Gaiman’s book Good Omens. Famine in this
modern dark comedy owns a chain of fast food restaurants. The more you eat, the
sooner you die of malnutrition.
A friend had been attending a mindfulness class. I asked
what mindfulness meant. She gave me an example: pain is pain. It happens and
then it abates. When one revisits the pain, that is suffering. Suffering is
memory of pain, rather than pain itself.
I was starving for news and could not stop consuming. The
news was making me suffer. I was lucky to regain my mental health because of Dr.
Christine Tracy and her book, The Newsphere.
News addiction, in an era when news is mixed with opinion
like a drug masked in a cocktail, has to be cured by avoidance. Dr. Tracy calls
it going on a news diet. She changed my brain. I read the sites and the columnists I had bookmarked, only
as Dr. Tracy suggested, I listened to my gut reaction. Was I angry? Did the news story make me think or just make me triumphant
because I agreed, or furious because I did not?
One by one I offloaded the bookmarks. Inch by column inch, I quit reading the loudest side-takers.
Then the more subtle nudgers. Any news that made my insides holler I stopped
reading. In the newsphere, I trained my brain to read those
writers/observers who advance my knowledge base, point me willingly to the
writers who are thoughtful and can debate the other side, and give me facts I
crave. Real news, real reporters. There are rules in journalism, and our world
has abandoned too many. Where and when the rules are abandoned, I abandon those
sources.
News can instigate dialogue and action. We must be aware and
active participants in our news consumption. When I comment today, I point out
where the piece went awry in actually being
news.
I commented on an inflammatory headline on a major news
site, and the headline was changed that day. I commented on an NPR story
headline that misrepresented the report of a medical paper, and NPR changed the
tagline. Was it me? I don’t know. I feel neither triumph nor anger. I did the
thing it was appropriate to do.
Participation in news - in keeping news honest and informative - is
healing, not damaging, both to the news cycle and the person consuming. Not
reacting when reaction is the goal is a gift. What I learned from The Newsphere
applies to life as well. I am calm. And grateful.
No comments:
Post a Comment